Ultimately I had to break up with my friends at Brooks Running because they made this fantastic line of shoes and all the shoes in the line only last 250-300 miles. (See the last line of the description in the image below.) You'd think with only 60% of the miles they'd be 60% the price of other running shoes but no. They're still $100. Sigh.
I broke up with Brooks in favor of ASICS whose shoes last a normal amount of miles and bought the ugly black shoes. They were a bear to break in. Part of the process involved entirely re-lacing the things so they weren't too tight or pulling in weird places on my arch. Whatever, these were 50% off the regular price. (I think I got a lower price because they're so ugly.)
The other conundrum in shoe replacement has to do with marathon race day shoes. The idea is to have a relatively fresh pair of shoes on race day, but the shoes have to be broken in already. It's a whole timing issue. I've had the ugly black shoes long enough they might be over their mileage by race day, or right on the edge. I needed a second pair of shoes now so I have time to break them in and get to know them before we spend an entire Sunday on a date together.
I headed back to Amazon and looked for another pair of the Lyte-33s, and even hoped to see the updated Lyte-33 2.0. I did see the newer shoe but the price was still pretty high. The model that's the same as the ugly black shoes was marked at a deep discount but only for some of the colors. I didn't think anything could be uglier than the all black. Wrong! Honest to goodness, I paid $33 for these shoes and when I clicked "buy" I wasn't sure if it was the right choice because the picture was just so ugly.
The shoes came in the mail today and I am thrilled to report that they look so much better in real life. ASICS needs a better photographer, or colorist or photo editor or something. It's not even the same shade of blue. I can't explain it.
No comments:
Post a Comment